• jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    With the Samsung smart TV use-case, these web cameras relied upon the Samsung TV uploading the firmware to the camera’s RAM each time it is connected.

    Why???

    • Magiilaro@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      This way they only need RAM on the device and can get rid of the need for persistent storage/flash memory. Makes a much simpler board design and easier manufacturing with less costs for parts.

      So efficient!! C-Level and shareholders love that!!

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Was flash storage more expensive then? Nowadays this might only save pennies per device, right?

        • Magiilaro@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Pennies per device can add up when hundreds of thousands of devices are produced. But it is not only the price of the storage but the whole circuit layout is simpler and therefore easier/faster to design and produce. That adds up too.

    • KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Probably so the camera could be updated on the fly and not be brickable via a random power cycle. Still seems stupid though.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        If it seems stupid, that just means that it was cheaper to do it this way.

        Program ROM/EEPROM + RAM, or just RAM connected to a USB interface with a reset line tied to the camera processor? See the USB device ID connect , fill the ram with the camera software, toggle processor reset , off you go.