• bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago
    • Man, it’s so annoying to have to use multiple machines because one isn’t beefy enough!
    • We can now shove the hardware of 10 machines into one, making it the beefiest!
    • Man, it’s so annoying to have to use such a beefy machine!
    • We can now divide a beefy machine into 10 mediocre ones, just like you always wanted!

    Make it make sense to me.

    • entwine@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not sure if you’re being sarcastic or not, but the point of this is to reduce overhead associated with virtualization (aka VMs). Few workloads are able to take advantage of the massive compute resources that a single beefy machine has, so partitioning it is the most efficient use of resources, especially in data centers where maximizing efficiency is important.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Sometimes you have different use cases. One beefy machine is likely more energy efficient. Many small machines allows reuse of old hardware.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I wish we’d get a proper microkernel, instead. If we’re going to accept some performance degradation, let’s get some benefit from it.

      Again: I have high hopes for Redox.