not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agoed postinglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1336arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1330arrow-down1imageed postinglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square49linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresping@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoI f’ing love emacs, but don’t get cocky. It’s a security disaster. Well, if you use any packages fetched from the net anyway.
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoI was being like 99% facetious and the 1% serious has more to do with how eMacs updates are distributed as compared to Notepad++. To your point, any non-vetted packages would be a huge source of risk, and even vetted packages should be monitored.
I f’ing love emacs, but don’t get cocky. It’s a security disaster.
Well, if you use any packages fetched from the net anyway.
All of our modern infrastructure is.
Fair point
I was being like 99% facetious and the 1% serious has more to do with how eMacs updates are distributed as compared to Notepad++. To your point, any non-vetted packages would be a huge source of risk, and even vetted packages should be monitored.