Yes, this is official documentation from the MS Learn course for the Agentic AI Solution Architect certificate

Microslop SharePhont™

  • ranzispa@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is not AI, AI would have made it much better. I mean, the only thing LLMs are quite good at is writing words, it is uncommon they misspell a word.

    • placebo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      LLMs misspell words in generated images. Modern models aren’t as bad as they were a year or two ago, but we don’t know what model was used here.

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It’s Microslop. The people who had any resemblance of work ethics left a long time ago. No one still working there gives any shits about QA - especially not the management.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    AI doesn’t misspell words. It’s more like hypercorrect which reveals it.

    Unless MS uses some very outdated models of course.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Rephrasing: I’ve used AI a lot and I haven’t seen it misspell anything in at least a year. Even in pictures these days. Depends on the model, of course.

  • CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Saw this article from Microslop the other day about their MDASH copilot model competing with Mythos for bug finding/fixing.

    Microsoft security blog

    And here’s the image they went with for the flowchart of what the AI does… Complete with overlapping text and the worst layout I’ve ever seen.

    Zero humans proofed this.

    Microsoft AI slop flowchart

    • death_to_carrots@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I know this! This is a slide deck which only makes sense in an interactive way, where the steps are revealed after one another. Probably straight from a presentation.

      Don’t attribute bad work to AI which can be done in the same way by an incompetent human.

      • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        As someone who’s career depended on presentations for a while:

        Never build animations in-slide (unless they are purely aesthetic).

        Instead:

        Build multiple slides which duplicate the previous and add new boxes with transitions on the slides. Bonus: change the title on each build to cover the key point.

        Sure, they take longer to edit. But that leave-behind export to PDF always works.

    • Bloefz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah those are very weird errors. Not like AI hallucinations. But more like OCR errors.

      I wonder if they imported another PowerPoint and then the AI made images out of it to process it. That would be a very inefficient way to do it.

      • mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Maybe the AI has had an OCR pass grafted onto its output processing to make it seem more capable of producing text. AI image generation usually makes weird alien looking text, I could imagine someone deciding to add on an automatic cleanup step to try to make it less obviously AI.

    • Notso@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Combigent [kəmˈbʌɪdʒ(ə)nt] {adj} A portmanteau of combine and emergent, describing sth. derived from combination, the ability to combine newly discovered facts or bullshit hallucinated by AI. Examples: The LLM gave a combigent response. The manager’s presentation was quite combigent.

    • bright@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Combigent (adj.)

      Definition: A word that seems like a real word but actually isn’t

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It also looks completely plausible for a word. I can see why an AI trained to make plausible-looking images generated it.

      Now I’m curious to see what other perfectly English-looking words it comes up with

      • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        How dqre you say such mean things about my computer boyfriend you’re just an irrational meanie I bet all the words you used here are fake too!

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Anyone remember how much nicer the world felt before we all realized nobody in charge of anything with any real power has any idea what the fuck they’re doing?

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      They know what they are doing. Their goals just don’t align with the rest of humanity.

      The mistake we make is in assuming that government choices are born of incompetence… The actions of empire are not incompetent. They are not intended to serve you or the citizens, but to serve material interests, the plunder of land, natural resources, markets, and cheap labor".

      -Michael Parenti

      RIP to the GOAT

      Edit: He talks about it in the lecture starting around 15:35. Though the quote above is from his book “against empire”

      https://youtu.be/s5oPFAfdrkU?t=935

    • Bloefz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well back then we thought everyone in charge was evil. Back then we had Krutschev, Nixon etc. Always nuclear war looming. And Reagan with this trickle downs, the Bush wars over made-up WMDs etc.

      I don’t think there was ever really a positive period. Maybe the 90s which was kinda the high point. Economics were good, America and NATO was the undisputed world power, nobody took global warming seriously yet and the internet was promising a great future.

      Then after 2000 we had the dot com crash, 9/11, the resulting wars, Russia becoming an enemy again, the financial world crisis, the rise of the internet as a surveillance tool, global warming, the pandemic, exploding house prices everywhere.

      Really pretty much exactly after the change of the century everything turned to shit.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      13 hours ago

      We didn’t all realize that at the same point. Some of us have known that for a very long time.

    • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      No that was a long time ago for some of us it’s always been like this you were just insulated by privilege